

Product Development & Launch
A product launch timeline tracking a web build alongside native iOS and Android builds — nested three deep under Build — plus partnerships, a two-track go-to-market (content and paid/growth), legal sign-off, and support readiness, all converging on one launch date. A start-to-finish link keeps partner integrations honest against when the iOS submission actually starts, and a finish-to-finish link ties a performance and accessibility audit to the web build finishing at the same time. Progress percentages show how each workstream is tracking, with beta milestones on every platform ahead of the final release.
- Build
- Partnerships
- Go-to-Market
- Legal & Compliance
- Support Readiness
Templates are a Pro feature — every project starts editable, and this one drops straight in once you're signed in.
Product launches fail at the seams. The build is fine, the messaging is fine, the partner integration is fine — and they're ready in the wrong order, weeks apart, with a press date already booked. This template puts five tracks on one chart for exactly that reason, across an eight-month cycle with betas on both platforms before the public date.
Who this product launch template is for
This is for whoever owns the launch date across functions — a product lead, a launch manager, a founder. It assumes a substantial launch: a web platform and at least one native app, an external partner, and a go-to-market effort that starts long before launch week.
The audience is cross-functional by definition. Engineering needs to see the go-to-market dependencies, marketing needs to see the build reality, and leadership needs to see whether the date holds. That's why it's one chart rather than five.
What are the phases of a product launch plan?
Five top-level lanes, one of them nested three deep.
Build splits into Web Platform (scoping, the web app build, and a performance and accessibility audit) and Native Apps — itself split into iOS and Android, each running its own build into its own beta and store submission.
Partnerships covers launch-partner NDAs, the partner integration work itself, co-marketing agreements, and partner enablement kits.
Go-to-Market splits into Content & Messaging (positioning, then the website and landing pages) and Paid & Growth (paid media planning and influencer seeding, then press and analyst briefings).
Legal & Compliance covers terms and privacy policy review, then data processing agreements.
Support Readiness covers the support runbook, team training, and an escalation path with engineering.
Eight milestones: feasibility approved, a web beta, betas on both native platforms, partner agreements signed, legal sign-off, public launch, and a post-launch retro.
How long does each track take?
About eight months end to end.
Build is the longest track at roughly thirty-five weeks — the web build alone runs about twenty-five weeks, and iOS and Android each run about twenty-four to twenty-five weeks in parallel, both currently tracking behind their baselines by about a week and a half.
Partnerships spans about thirty-one weeks once integrations run their full course. Go-to-Market spans about twenty-nine weeks with that deliberate mid-programme gap. Legal closes early, in about ten weeks, and Support Readiness runs the final eight weeks of the programme, closing out a few days after public launch rather than stopping cold on launch day.
The most consequential figure to preserve is that integration work doesn't finish until the iOS submission has started — partner-facing work stays open far longer than a simple "integrate once" bar would suggest, because partners need the app in its final submitted state before their own sign-off can close.
Which dependencies matter for a launch?
Twenty-one links, and seven of them are start-to-start.
The hard sequential link is scoping finishing before every build track starts — web, iOS, and Android all wait on the same feasibility assessment, then run independently from there.
Several links overlap deliberately. The web performance audit starts while the web build is still in progress, and the two are tied finish-to-finish: they close on exactly the same day, so the audit never quietly slips behind the build it's checking. Paid media planning and influencer seeding start on the same day, both keyed to when the landing pages are far enough along. Co-marketing work starts alongside the partner NDAs closing, not after a separate kickoff.
The link worth naming directly is start-to-finish, between iOS submission and partner integrations: integrations can't be considered finished until the iOS submission has started. In this build the two dates land on the same day — integration work wraps the moment submission begins, because partners need the app in its final state before their side can close.
What to change for your own launch
Set the public launch date and work backwards
Launches usually have a fixed external date — an event, a fiscal quarter, a partner announcement. Anchor it, then let the dependency chain show you when scoping had to start.
Check the gap between your last beta and launch
About three weeks here on each platform. If yours is under that and you ship a native app, that's the single riskiest assumption in your plan.
Add a bar for every partner
One integration bar is a simplification. Each partner has their own calendar and their own capacity to be late, and each deserves to be visible.
Keep the positioning gap
Resist the urge to stretch Go-to-Market across the whole timeline just because the lane looks empty. Empty lane time is honest.
Baseline at the web beta milestone
By then the estimates are grounded in real build velocity. A baseline set at kickoff is a baseline set against guesses.
Common mistakes on launch plans
One "product" bar. Web, iOS, and Android have different risks and different external gatekeepers.
Marketing on a separate chart. Guarantees the two plans drift and that nobody notices until launch month.
No beta milestones. Without them there's no checkpoint at which someone can say the date is at risk while there's still time to move it.
Partner work starting after the build. Partners aren't a downstream task; they're a parallel organisation with their own quarter.
Treating a build as finished when the code is done. This template's finish-to-finish audit link exists to catch exactly that gap between "feature complete" and "actually ready."
Sharing the launch plan
A launch plan is read by engineering, marketing, partners, and leadership — four audiences who share almost no tooling. Export a PDF for the partner pack and a PNG for the weekly launch stand-up, and re-export as the bars move. None of those recipients needs an account to open it, which is what lets one chart serve as the shared reference instead of four divergent copies.
Questions about this template
- How far ahead should a product launch be planned?
- This template spans about eight months from technical scoping to public launch, with beta releases on both platforms in the final month. That's a realistic shape for a launch involving a web build, two native apps, and partner integrations. Launches planned in under three months almost always cut the partnership track, which is the one with external dependencies you don't control.
- Should web and native builds be separate bars?
- Yes, always, and this template goes further — iOS and Android are separate bars nested under Native Apps, each with its own beta and submission steps. They have different teams, different review processes, and critically different release mechanics, since app store review is outside your control. Collapsing them hides the fact that one platform can be ready while the other is stuck in review.
- What does the start-to-finish link between iOS submission and partner integrations mean?
- That partner integrations can't be considered *finished* until the iOS App Store submission has *started*. In this build the two dates land on exactly the same day — integration work wraps the moment submission begins, because partners need the platform to be in its final, submitted state before their own side can be signed off. A finish-to-start link would force integrations to wait for submission to clear review entirely, which is a much longer and less realistic wait.
- What is the difference between a beta milestone and a launch milestone?
- A beta is a readiness checkpoint you control; a launch is a commitment you've told the market about. This template has two betas — one per platform — and one launch for that reason. Treating a beta as a launch creates pressure to ship something unfinished; treating a launch as a beta creates a credibility problem with everyone outside the team.
- How do I keep go-to-market and engineering on the same plan?
- Give them separate lanes on one chart rather than separate charts. This template runs Build, Partnerships, Go-to-Market, Legal & Compliance, and Support Readiness in parallel so a positioning delay and an engineering delay are visible in the same view. Two separate plans is how marketing ends up ready six weeks before the product is.